The token endpoint already refused grant types the client had not
registered, but reported it as `invalid_grant`. RFC 6749 section 5.2
reserves `invalid_grant` for an authorization grant which is "invalid,
expired, revoked, does not match the redirection URI used in the
authorization request, or was issued to another client", and defines
`unauthorized_client` for a client which "is not authorized to use this
authorization grant type".
Report the condition with the error code the specification assigns to it,
matching the device authorization endpoint.
The device authorization endpoint issued a device code to any registered
client, without checking that the client had registered the
`urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:device_code` grant type. Such a client
could therefore start a device authorization flow and have the server
show an approval prompt to a user, even though the subsequent token
request was always going to be refused.
RFC 8628 section 3.2 states that, in the event of an error such as an
invalidly configured client, the device authorization endpoint responds
in the same way as the token endpoint specified in RFC 6749 section 5.2,
which defines `unauthorized_client` as "the authenticated client is not
authorized to use this authorization grant type".
Apply the same grant type check the token endpoint already performs, and
add the `unauthorized_client` error code it requires.
roomuserid_lastnotificationread was mapped to userroomid_highlightcount
instead of its own table, so last_notification_read() read the highlight
count and reset_notification_counts clobbered the highlight table when
setting a read marker. Add the missing table definition and fix the alias.
The appservice branch of update_device_route (MSC4190 device creation)
generated a random device ID instead of using the one from the request
path, and dropped the requested display name. The PUT returned 200, but
the device the appservice asked for never existed, so every subsequent
request masquerading as that device failed with M_FORBIDDEN and one
orphaned random-ID device was left behind per attempt.
This made encrypted mautrix (bridgev2) bridges unable to start on
OIDC-enabled servers, where MSC4190 is the only available device
creation mechanism: /keys/upload failed on first start and /keys/query
on every restart. Combined with the pre-1f5e178c3f behaviour (400
"Token conflicts with an existing appservice token"), MSC4190 device
creation has never worked end-to-end in any release.
Create the device under the requested ID and forward the requested
display name.